Mandible Fracture
Unfortunately, children are at significant risk for traumatic injuries, whether they be young or old. Injury prevention strategies is, obviously, the best way to avoid these events, but “accidents” do happen, so we need to be facile with managing all aspects of pediatric traumatic injuries (ex, Splenic Injury, Abdominal Trauma, Thoracic Trauma, Aortic Injury, Pelvic Trauma). Recently a colleague of ours @BurnsidePatrick inquired about Mandible Fractures in children. Well, Dr. Burnside, that is a great question (if you have a clinical question, don’t hesitate to email the question to pedemmorselsfox@gmail.com)… so let us take a moment to digest a Morsel on Mandible Fracture.
Mandible Fracture: Basics
- The mandible is the most commonly fractured facial bone (>30%) in children. [Allred, 2015; Imahara, 2008]
- Facial fractures, overall, in children are more rare than in adults.
- The proportion of cranium to face is greater in young children compared to adults.
- 8 : 1 (cranium : face) at birth
- 2.5 : 1 (cranium : face) in adults
- As children age, risk for facial injury increases. [Imahara, 2008]
- The proportion of cranium to face is greater in young children compared to adults.
- Age Matters [Owusu, 2016]
- Mean age for mandible fracture = 14 years
- For children <12 years of age
- Fall is most common cause
- Condyle most frequent fracture site
- Teenagers are different (>12 years of age)
- Assault is most common cause (~40% of cases) [Hoppe, 2015]
- Angle of mandible is the most frequent fracture site in teenagers
- Motor Vehicle Collisions, Falls, Violence, Bicycles and Sports are the major causes. [Owusu, 2016; Smith, 2013; Imahara, 2008]
Mandible Fracture: Evaluation
- Scrutinize for other traumatic injuries. [Owusu, 2016; Allred, 2015]
- Associated intracranial injuries found in 8.5% [Owusu, 2016]
- Associated cervical spine fractures found in 4.4% [Owusu, 2016]
- So, don’t need to reflexively order head and neck CT, but do need to carefully assess.
- Look for lacerations
- External lacerations of the chin may be sign of force directed posteriorly, leading to crush injury to the condyles. [Wolfswinkel, 2013]
- Intra-oral lacerations may change management (i.e., open fractures).
- Any fracture through a tooth-bearing region is considered an “open” fracture and requires prophylactic antibiotic therapy. [Wolfswinkel, 2013]
- Assess for numbness
- Fracture of the body of the mandible can lead to inferior alveolar nerve injury.
- Check for numbness of chin or teeth.
- Assess for malocclusion
- Asking the patient about the bite occlusion is useful.
- Bimanual palpation (intra-orally and extra-orally) can help find asymmetry too. [Wolfswinkel, 2013]
- Palpate the TMJ also.
- Look for loose teeth or lost teeth! (see Dental Trauma)
- TONGUE BLADE BITE TEST! [Neiner, 2016]
- In small group of pediatric patients, this was found to be 100% sensitive and 88.9% specific.
- Negative predictive value = 100%
- (yes, small study… so it is worth repeating)
- If the kid is able to break the tongue blade with her/his bite, then no mandible fracture!
Mandible Fracture: Imaging
- Panorex
- Historically considered study of choice
- Requires patient cooperation (tough for acutely injured children)
- Requires specialized equipment
- Can’t be performed on patient with possible C-Spine injury
- Inferior to CT when looking specifically for condylar fracture. [Gelesko, 2013]
- Plain Films
- Can provide timely information
- Need to obtain “mandible series” = PA, Townes, Bilateral Obliques, Lateral and Subment0vertex views
- CT
- Most versatile and useful modality
- Particularly useful for detecting subtle or questionable fractures.
- If Panorex shows midline mandible fracture, CT recommended to evaluate for genial tubercle fracture. [Gelesko, 2013]
Mandible Fracture: Management
- The future growth of the mandible has to be carefully considered when considering operative management.
- The posterior borders of the condyle and ramus actively remodel for normal growth.
- The body and symphysis undergo minimal changes normally.
- Operative vs non-operative strategies can be successfully employed.
- “Best” strategy still debated.
- Open reduction more likely to be needed for:
- Multiple fractures – less stable fracture patterns
- Certain fracture locations – ex., isolated body fracture
- Older patients – younger patients more likely to have greenstick fractures
- Non-surgical stabilization is also option for some injuries:
- Condylar fractures
- Non-displaced fractures are most often managed conservatively. [Wolfswinkel, 2013]
- Resorbable fixation devices are also employed.
- Strength for 4-6 weeks.
- Degrade over course of 1-2 years.
- Soft Diet and Pain Meds!
- Unless going to the OR, a soft diet can be initiated.
- Patient may require period of hospitalization to ensure adequate pain control to assist with oral intake.
Moral of the Morsel
- Thoroughly evaluate the child for concomitant injuries.
- Perform Tongue Blade Bite Test! If able to break the blade, awesome! Save the kid from the CT scan.
- If clinically apparent fracture, then consider lower sensitivity tests (Panorex).
- If concern for subtle fracture, CT is the best means to truly evaluate the entire mandible.
- Do not forget the social considerations and impact of interpersonal violence! – consult your social worker and help this child avoid another ED visit due to violence.
References
Neiner J1, Free R1, Caldito G1, Moore-Medlin T1, Nathan CA1. Tongue Blade Bite Test Predicts Mandible Fractures. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2016 Jun;9(2):121-4. PMID: 27162567. [PubMed] [Read by QxMD]
Owusu JA1, Bellile E2, Moyer JS2, Sidman JD3. Patterns of Pediatric Mandible Fractures in the United States. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016 Jan-Feb;18(1):37-41. PMID: 26470008. [PubMed] [Read by QxMD]
Hoppe IC1, Kordahi AM, Lee ES, Granick MS. Pediatric Facial Fractures: Interpersonal Violence as a Mechanism of Injury. J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jul;26(5):1446-9. PMID: 26106996. [PubMed] [Read by QxMD]
Allred LJ1, Crantford JC, Reynolds MF, David LR. Analysis of Pediatric Maxillofacial Fractures Requiring Operative Treatment: Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes. J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Nov;26(8):2368-74. PMID: 26517461. [PubMed] [Read by QxMD]
Swanson EW1, Susarla SM1, Ghasemzadeh A2, Mundinger GS1, Redett RJ3, Tufaro AP3, Manson PN4, Dorafshar AH5. Application of the Mandible Injury Severity Score to Pediatric Mandibular Fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jul;73(7):1341-9. PMID: 25936782. [PubMed] [Read by QxMD]
Morrow BT1, Samson TD, Schubert W, Mackay DR. Evidence-based medicine: Mandible fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Dec;134(6):1381-90. PMID: 25415101. [PubMed] [Read by QxMD]
Smith DM1, Bykowski MR, Cray JJ, Naran S, Rottgers SA, Shakir S, Vecchione L, Schuster L, Losee JE. 215 mandible fractures in 120 children: demographics, treatment, outcomes, and early growth data. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jun;131(6):1348-58. PMID: 23714795. [PubMed] [Read by QxMD]
Wolfswinkel EM1, Weathers WM, Wirthlin JO, Monson LA, Hollier LH Jr, Khechoyan DY. Management of pediatric mandible fractures. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013 Oct;46(5):791-806. PMID: 24138738. [PubMed] [Read by QxMD]
Gelesko S1, Markiewicz MR, Bell RB. Responsible and prudent imaging in the diagnosis and management of facial fractures. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2013 Nov;25(4):545-60. PMID: 24183372. [PubMed] [Read by QxMD]
Imahara SD1, Hopper RA, Wang J, Rivara FP, Klein MB. Patterns and outcomes of pediatric facial fractures in the United States: a survey of the National Trauma Data Bank. J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Nov;207(5):710-6. PMID: 18954784. [PubMed] [Read by QxMD]
[…] Oral trauma (lacerations and mandible fractures) […]
[…] when caring for children. We have previously reviewed several facial injury topics (see, Mandibular Fractures, Dental Trauma, Tongue Lacerations, and Eyelid Lacerations). Eye injuries can sometimes be […]